Response to Hypocrisy

I find myself agreeing with you, Pimmeh. Many a time in life have I experienced a regular hypocrite. However, I believe that it is part of human nature, which as intellectuals and humans, must try and find and destroy.

We have evolved over the many thousands of years into what we are today. No longer are do we have to evolve because we don't have to adapt anymore. We, instead, manipulate nature. However, as animals, we are still evolving, if not in the physical, in mind. Hypocrisy is a natural trait of Homo Sapiens Sapiens and always will be. However, intellectuals such as mine and yourself have gone beyond this “species” into a new one, which I like to dub “Homo Sapiens Supreme”.

Unfortunately, society is not based upon the simple system of “Survival of the Fittest” anymore and we are left with the drudges of Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Therefore, we're left with a big scummy residue stuck to us in the ecological stew we call life.

First, before, I continue, we must define this “scum”:

• A person, who is in full ability to work, who sponges off the government

• Hypocrites

• Generally, all those that make it their life to aggravate us intellectuals.

I do not believe in murder as an answer for this problem, this stink, in society. In fact, I will be gracious and merciful. However, before I come to the solution, I must describe what I call “The Party”.

The Party is a theoretical political party, consisting of intellectuals, again like me and yourself. The main policies behind this party are as follows:

• Decrease unemployment by 100%.

• Boost the economy of the European Union.

• Call for the formation of a European super-state (Benefits to all EU members must be worked out before attempted)

The Party will aim to decrease unemployment and boost economy by killing to birds with one stone. This consists of setting up state-owned factories all over Europe. These state-run factories would employ those who are unemployed and taking benefits from tax payers, like ourselves. The wage would be the same as what they earn from just lazing around all day. This would encourage these people to get better, more rewarding jobs or seek higher education, if not obtained already. I understand that not every single person would be able to progress further than working in a state-run factory, so they shall have to remain there forever.

On the subject of the unemployed; those which are disabled to a degree where they cannot possibly work under normal circumstances will also benefit of this system because the money made from the state-run factories would go in to funding Specially designed work places for those with common disabilities. No longer would the disabled have to feel inadequate. They would be able to work and feel as if they are contributing to society.

In conclusion, The Party would, theoretically, push towards everybody become Homo Sapiens Supreme, in a way where “Survival of the Fittest” is not fully enforced but enforced in some way. I know Human Rights campaigners would disagree to “Survival of the Fittest” but they can't argue with the system of The Party, for they themselves would be hypocrites, and show that they are only “Homo Sapiens Sapiens”. Why? Well, because they are campaigning for a system which encourages people to sit at home, on their backsides, all day and get money for it. There shouldn't be any right to do that. If they wish to do so, they must also find their own resources to survive, and not sponge off the resources of the government; The Party.